Last updated on June 9, 2019
first part. Hegland, 2019.Once the user chooses a Glossary Entry, additional request appears below, asking the user to add a further relationship with the same two terms, but the other way around. Also, the little [+] only appears now, in case the user wants to add further relationships.
If possible, this additional relationship will be posted to the other term, (Liquid Information Environment, not Liquid | Flow) appended at the bottom of the term, if this is feasible.
second part. Hegland, 2019.Dynamic View
This way the dynamic graph view can support showing both Liquid | Flow and Liquid Information in the centre:
flow in the centre. Hegland, 2019.And once the user clicks on ‘Liquid Information’ it moves to the centre, showing relationships from its perspective–which turned out to be the key.
liquid information in the centre. Hegland, 2019.To make it clear
In the dynamic view, users can drag-and-drop one node onto another to create visible links which spawns a dialog to specify the category of relationship in both directions.
Animation Test
Alternative Dialog, with Radio buttons for type:
[…] or through software, as designed by us or anyone else: This is how it is done now and this is the future design where there is a more sophisticated handling of the relationships between terms but also no […]
[…] Glossary Dialog for Liquid | Flow to support Dynamic Graph View […]
[…] Glossary Dialog for Liquid | Flow to support Dynamic Graph View […]
[…] Glossary Dialog for Liquid | Flow to support Dynamic Graph View […]
[…] Glossary Dialog for Liquid | Flow to support Dynamic Graph View […]
[…] Glossary dialog for Flow […]